Skip to main content

Masked Inversion in French

In this important work of linguistic analysis, Paul M. Postal addresses a paradigm anomaly in French that has hitherto resisted explanation. A general restriction limiting the form of direct objects in complex infinitival constructions with main verbs like faire fails to hold with certain subordinate verbs, especially connaître. Marshaling extensive evidence, Postal argues that this apparent irregularity is a symptom of a deeper regularity. Rather than being an ordinary transitive complement, the subordinate clause in these cases is actually an Inversion structure, one in which the logical subject demotes to indirect object. However, since this demotion induces no word order change or other direct morphological consequences, the inversion is "masked," and revealed only by several types of apparent anomalies.

This analysis has significant consequences for contemporary syntactic theories. First, the arguments support the view that a sentence’s superficial structure cannot be identified with its syntactic structure, even though such an identification is a fundamental assumption of several currently influential grammatical frameworks. Second, even certain theories that do posit abstract aspects of grammatical form fail to allow for the needed Inversion structures. Postal’s study supports theories based on the notion of arc and stratification into levels which provide a natural treatment consistent with the factual requirements.

Masked Inversion in French is the first systematic account of this puzzling French syntactic anomaly, and its findings will stimulate research in many areas of natural language grammatical structure.

166 pages | 26 line drawings | 6.00 x 9.00 | © 1989

Language and Linguistics: Language Studies, Syntax and Semantics

Table of Contents

1. Partially Correlated Anomalies
1.1. Some Apparently Odd Reflexive/Reciprocal Sentences
1.2. Further Odd Reflexive Sentences
1.3. A Constraint on Reflexive/Reciprocal 1s
1.4. Implications of the Correlated Anomalies
2. The CIC as a Clause Union Structure
2.1. Fragments of the Arc Pair Grammar Framework
2.2. Fragments of a Theory of Clause Union Structures
3. The Inversion Hypothesis
3.1. Formulating FC and the Passive Analysis of Certain CIC Complements
3.2. An Account of Nonstandard Complements Analogous to a Passive Analysis
3.3. Absolute Inversion in CIC Complements
3.4. Differences between connaître and Other Nonstandard Verbs
4. Further Arguments for the Masked Inversion Hypothesis
4.1. Manner Adverbial Expressions
4.2. Purposive Expressions
4.3. Phrases with sans
4.4. Adverbial Expressions and ’Inherently’ Reflexive Vs
5. FC and Counterfactual Contexts
6. Conclusions

Be the first to know

Get the latest updates on new releases, special offers, and media highlights when you subscribe to our email lists!

Sign up here for updates about the Press