Maimonides and Spinoza
Their Conflicting Views of Human Nature
Maimonides and Spinoza
Their Conflicting Views of Human Nature
Until the last century, it was generally agreed that Maimonides was a great defender of Judaism, and Spinoza—as an Enlightenment advocate for secularization—among its key opponents. However, a new scholarly consensus has recently emerged that the teachings of the two philosophers were in fact much closer than was previously thought. In his perceptive new book, Joshua Parens sets out to challenge the now predominant view of Maimonides as a protomodern forerunner to Spinoza—and to show that a chief reason to read Maimonides is in fact to gain distance from our progressively secularized worldview.
240 pages | 6 x 9 | © 2012
Philosophy: History and Classic Works
Political Science: Classic Political Thought
Reviews
Table of Contents
Chapter 1. Desire (Shahwa) and Spiritedness (Ghadab) vs. Conatus
Chapter 2. Veneration vs. Equality
Chapter 3. Forms vs. Laws of Nature
Chapter 4. Freedom vs. Determinism
Chapter 5. Teleology vs. Imagined Ideal
Chapter 6. Prudence vs. Imagination
Epilogue
Appendix: Richard Kennington’s Spinoza and Esotericism in Spinoza’s Thought
Index
Be the first to know
Get the latest updates on new releases, special offers, and media highlights when you subscribe to our email lists!