Form, Function and Style
Distributed for Reaktion Books
Form, Function and Style
The Suit unpicks the story of this most familiar garment, from its emergence in western Europe at the end of the seventeenth century to today. Suit-wearing figures such as the Savile Row gentleman and the Wall Street businessman have long embodied ideas of tradition, masculinity, power, and respectability, but the suit has also been used to disrupt concepts of gender and conformity. Adopted and subverted by women, artists, musicians, and social revolutionaries through the decades—from dandies and Sapeurs to the Zoot Suit and Le Smoking—the suit is also a device for challenging the status quo. For all those interested in the history of menswear, this beautifully illustrated book offers new perspectives on this most mundane, and poetic, product of modern culture.
256 pages | 70 color plates, 30 halftones | 6 x 9 1/2 | © 2016
“Expertly shows how the adoption of the suit was a manifestation of societal change as the great European wars of the 17th and 18th centuries morphed into the Industrial Revolution and thereon into the modern democratic world. Indeed, it would be hard to name another facet of our modern culture that has so effortlessly and variously expressed the cross-purposes of, say, Baudelaire, Le Corbusier, and Mao Zedong. The suit is the perfect signifier, and as Mr. Breward shows, it carries all the noble, artistic, economic, and perverse impulses of our culture.”
Wall Street Journal
“The Suit has its own spare, modernist elegance. It presents a decisively uncluttered history of menswear, cutting a clean line through eighteenth-century French military uniforms to dandies, Pasolini films and twentieth-century Italian tailoring, all the while insisting on the suit’s ‘all-pervasive influence in modern and contemporary cultures.'”
“[Breward] is knowledgeable about his subject, insightful in his analysis, and imaginative in the connections that he makes. The result is a thoughtful and at times lively riffle through the male wardrobe from Restoration England onward.”
“An attractively illustrated history unpicking the story of the gentleman’s tailored suit from its emergence in Western Europe at the end of the 17th century to its fate in the 21st century.”
“Metropolis Summer Reading List 2016. . . . A scholarly history of sartorial style, a dialectic between peacock fashions and their renunciation.”
“Breward offers a compendious account of the evolution of the suit from the gaudily decorated outfits of the Elizabethen court, through the luxury textile trade, to the genesis of something like the modern idea of well-dressed manhood (essentially, expensive understatement) in the nineteenth-century Parisian cult of the dandy. . . . When Breward ventures beyond just telling his story to speculate a little on the cultural resonances behind it, he does so with a sharp, laconic intelligence.”
Times Literary Supplement
“Breward’s intelligent consideration of the suit is an antidote to all the bombastic ‘how to’ guides written by fashion journalists and bloggers whose idea of cultural context is to speed read a Wikipedia page. . . . a rich, deep, and satisfying study.”
World of Interiors
“Breward’s book on the history and culture of the gentleman’s suit is a handsome, hardback volume with a generous number of large-format illustrations. . . . His is not a straightforward, object-oriented interpretation; what makes the book such a clever and rewarding read lies in how Breward assumes the position of a tailor in tackling a cultural history of the suit, as if fashioning a garment in material form. This is a book crafted by the measuring, marking, aligning, fitting and shaping of evidence. Just as the seam allowances of a bespoke suit allow its proportions to be altered to fit a body modified by the regimes and excesses of life, so Breward appreciates that cultural and material histories are also malleable, with margins that can be redrawn and reassembled.”
Journal of Design History
“Spirited and well researched, The Suit: Form, Function and Style is a thoroughly informed examination of the ubiquitous garment that is a staple in every man’s life. Combining both substance and style, it provides a journey into the evolution of the suit and its cultural influence through the ages.”
Ed Burstell, Managing Director, Liberty
“In its long history the suit has been both a symbol of adherence to mainstream authority as well as a weapon of rebellion. In this book, Breward masterfully traces the suit’s influence in modern and contemporary cultures with thorough scholarship and vivid writing. The Suit is a magical tour of the corporeal terrain of the garment that continues to intrigue us as it reflects the ever-changing economic and cultural contexts in which it is found. A triumph of scholarship and a joy to read.”
G. Bruce Boyer, author of True Style: The History and Principles of Classic Menswear, Rebel Style, and Gary Cooper: Enduring Style
“Breward climbs into every armhole and measures every inside leg. He stops at nothing to decode the enigmas of men’s tailoring.”
Simon Doonan, Creative Ambassador for Barneys New York and author of The Asylum: True Tales of Madness from a Life in Fashion
Table of Contents
1. Well Suited
2. Suiting Nations
3. Sharp Suits
4. Seeing the Suit
5. Epilogue: Future Suits
I have only praise for my clothes. They actually are the earliest human outfit. The materials are the same as the cloak that Wodin, the mythical Norse leader of the ‘wild hunt’[,] wore . . . It is mankind’s primeval dress . . . [It] can, regardless of the era and the area of the globe, cover the nakedness of the pauper without adding a foreign note to the time or the landscape . . . It has always been with us . . . It is the dress of those rich in spirit. It is the dress of the self-reliant. It is the attire of people whose individuality is so strong they cannot bring themselves to express it with the aid of garish colours, plumes or elaborate modes of dress. Woe to the painter expressing his individuality with a satin frock, for the artist in him has resigned in despair.
The earnest consideration of clothing by literary and artistic Vienna a century ago operated in an intellectual context far removed from the more superficial concerns of much early twenty-first-century celebrity- and brand-focused public fashion discourse. The social, economic and spatial circumstances in which clothes are made, sold, promoted and worn have also developed in myriad ways. But the suit itself, as worn and understood by Loos, survives in barely modified form as an item of everyday and formal wear in most regions of the world. Its apparent demise as a relevant component of work, leisured and ceremonial dress has been trumpeted by successive pundits, although its unobtrusive yet ubiquitous contours still furnish the bodies of men and women in all walks of life, from politicians to estate agents, bankers to rabbis, courtroom defendants to wedding grooms.
This book, in its tracing of the suit’s all-pervasive influence in modern and contemporary cultures, will attempt to do justice to Adolf Loos’s faith in his clothes; to show how the suit’s simple solutions have emerged and how its original meanings persist and adapt to denote truths that are greater than a basic meeting of cloth, scissors and thread. In order to do so, it will be necessary to start with the fundamentals, with the form of the suit itself.
Bespoke (fitted to the customer’s precise measurements and handmade locally by master craftsmen) or ready-to-wear (presized and mass-manufactured across a network of often distant factories by hand and machine), the suit as we know it now conforms to a basic two- or three-piece structure, generally made in finely woven wool or wool mix with a canvas, horsehair and cotton (or synthetic cotton) interlining to provide structure, and a silk or viscose lining. Its fabrics have always been an integral element of the suit’s appeal and an important marker of its quality. The selection of smooth worsteds, soft Saxonies and rough Cheviots, divided into standard baratheas, military Bedford cords, glossy broadcloths, sporting cavalry twills, workaday corduroys, elegant flannels, strong serges, hardy tweeds and homespuns, and dressy velvets, dictates the colour, texture, fit, handle and longevity of a suit, and is often the first consideration in the process of specification. The choice of weave and design – plain or Panama, hopsack or Celtic, diagonal, Mayo, Campbell or Russian twill, Bannockburn or pepper and salt, pinhead, birdseye, Eton stripe, barleycorn, herringbone, dogtooth, Glenurquhart or Prince of Wales check, pin- or chalkstripe – becomes the key to a customer’s character.
In made-up form, the suit is usually characterized by a longsleeved, buttoned jacket with lapels and pockets, a sleeveless waistcoat or vest worn underneath the jacket (if three-piece) and long trousers. The simplicity of its appearance is belied by the complexity of its construction, as a recent comparative study of ready-made suit manufacture commissioned by the British Government Department of Trade and Industry demonstrated:
A tailored jacket has an intricate structure, composed of as many as 40–50 components . . . Its manufacture may involve up to 75 separate operations. The first step in the production process is the ‘marker’ – a pattern according to which the many components . . . are cut from the material . . . The production sequence is, in principle, similar to making cars. The various parts are made first, they are then assembled into sub-assemblies, which are progressively brought together for final assembly. Smaller items are made . . . in parallel with the body fronts – interlinings, back sections, pockets, collars, sleeves, and sleeve linings. Pockets and interlinings are attached to the body front. Back sections are joined to the fronts, then collars. Sleeves are lined and then joined to the body. Buttonholes and buttons are added . . . A range of mechanical presses, each with a moulded shape, are used for top pressing the completed garment.
The analogy with the automated production-line processes of car manufacturing is, however, misleading. As the authors of the report go on to explain, the almost sensile, embodied nature of the product entails an attention to the idiosyncracies of the individual suit style, impossible to achieve through total mechanization:
The favoured approach is the ‘progressive bundle’ system, whereby all the parts needed to make a suit are bundled together, and are progressively assembled. Operators are grouped according to the section of the garment on which they work and the work is passed between them. The system has the flexibility to cope with variations between one suit and another, with training and absenteeism.
The contemporary ready-made suit, then, is the product of a widely recognized and well-ordered system of manufacture, refined and democratized throughout the twentieth century by high-street pioneers and international brands, and present in the wardrobes of many. Its bespoke variation continues to be manufactured on traditional lines, for an elite minority in the West and a wider audience in Asia and the developing world. Both options conform to an accepted set of parameters that produce a fairly standardized and familiar necessity, almost boring in the predictability of its form. But it was not always thus. When the proposition of a ‘suit’ of clothing (a well-fitted set of garments to be worn at the same time, although not necessarily of matching cloth) emerged in Europe’s cities and royal courts during the fourteenth century, its construction was more likely to constitute a complex negotiation between the skill of the tailor and other craftsmen and women, and the tastes and desires of the client. The possibilities for variation were endless.
Surviving letters of the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries between members of the nobility and their agents who were procuring dress items for them in London and elsewhere, and early autobiographical accounts of sartorial choices, betray an intense consideration of several variables regarding price, quality of materials, detail of cut and construction, colour and adherence to notions of fashionableness, modesty and courtly style, all complicated by the more specialized circumstances of the clothing trades in this period. The commission of one ‘suit’ of clothes would involve transactions with several tradesmen, from the cloth merchant to the tailor, the button and buttonhole-makers, the embroiderer and so on.