Skip to main content

Distributed for University of British Columbia Press

Defining Rights and Wrongs

Bureaucracy, Human Rights, and Public Accountability

Human rights complaints attract a great deal of public interest, but what is going on below the surface? When people contact a human rights lawyer, how do they think about and use human rights discourse? How are complaints turned into cases? Can administrative systems be both effective and fair? Defining Rights and Wrongs investigates the day-to-day practices of low-level officials and intermediaries as they construct domestic human rights complaints. It identifies the values that a human rights system should uphold if it is to promote mutual respect and foster the personal dignity and equal rights of citizens.


224 pages | © 2007

Law and Society

Political Science: Political and Social Theory


Table of Contents

Acknowledgments

Introduction

1 An Overview of Public Administration of Human Rights Enforcement in Canada

2 The Roles of Frontline Staff and Independent Lawyers in the Public Administration of Human Rights Enforcement

3 Transforming Human Rights Complaints into Cases

4 Publics, Counterpublics, and the Public Interest

Conclusion

Appendix: Excerpts from the Ontario Human Rights Code

Notes; Bibliography; Index

Be the first to know

Get the latest updates on new releases, special offers, and media highlights when you subscribe to our email lists!

Sign up here for updates about the Press