An Anthropology of Analogy
An Anthropology of Analogy
Using French magicians’ engagements with North African ritual performers as a case study, Jones shows how magic became enshrined in anthropological reasoning. Acknowledging the residue of magic’s colonial origins doesn’t require us to dispense with it. Rather, through this radical reassessment of classic anthropological ideas, Magic’s Reason develops a new perspective on the promise and peril of cross-cultural comparison.
"With Magic’s Reason, Jones seeks to show how comparison within the realm of magic assisted in the construction of modernity. His line of inquiry may well be worth pursuing in the late 20th and early 21st century—guided by the curiosity for how magical assemblages remain entangled in human grappling with drawing distinctions or dividing lines between own and other, belief and superstition, the effectiveness of the paranormal and commodified hoax. Jones has offered a highly stimulating if complex read that opens further possibilities for the critical engagement with anthropological theorizing in its continuous intersection with other social actors and movements."
"Magic’s Reason is based on a brilliant aperçu—why shouldn’t anthropology come to terms with today’s secular magic?. . . anthropology can make claims to pursue globalized truths not just because its practices can be learned through training, but because universities and their disciplines are now, as a matter of fact, global, the world being divided into nation-states, almost all of which contain universities, and many of these train and hire ethnographers. Magic and reason have nothing to do with it. But, of course, as Jones’s excellent study also shows, such an understanding of anthropology. . . would not mean that the discipline could fully take account of itself and its conditions of emergence. That would still require multifaceted and conceptually subtle ethnohistories of reason’s complex relation to magic, of the kind presented so well here."
Simon During, Public Books
“Less a symphony and more a suite of dances, the individual chapters hang together as well as they do not necessarily because of thematic development, but more because of Jones's capacity for intellectual counterpoint. An easy read for specialists, this small gem of a book tacks between ethnographic detail and anthropological macro in a very satisfying way indeed.”
Alex Golub, University of Hawaii at Manoa
“Magic’s Reason is thoughtful, beautifully written, intellectually sweeping, and theoretically ambitious. The quite persuasive story Jones tells is that primitive magic becomes compelling because those who study it assert a view of the world central to a western vision of reality: that the material world is what is real, and the world of the supernatural, of the immaterial, and even of thought itself, is not real in the same way. This is a peculiar and culturally specific view in the context of world history, and the perennial fascination of magic is that it both challenges this worldview and is embedded in it.”
Tanya Luhrmann, Stanford University
“Acute in his wide and deep reading of earlier as well as contemporary anthropological theories of magic, Jones moves from showman to shaman and back again. We get to see the Algerian Isawi hadra, trance-induced shamanic feats of superhuman powers, through the eyes of Jean-Eugène Robert-Houdin, the mid-nineteenth century father of French magic. This sets the ethnographic tableau against which Magic’s Reason relates the emergence of anthropology to such colonial knowledge and to anxieties of the would-be disenchanted West about whether and how to distinguish by degrees ‘primitive’ versus ‘modern’ mentalities in the face of the persisting sociocultural ubiquity of occult beliefs and practices and of illusionist entertainment as well as ritual performativity.”
Michael Silverstein, University of Chicago
“Magic’s Reason introduces a fresh element into the well-developed comparativist discourse of the anthropology of magic…and…challenges…the existing boundaries of one of anthropology’s most enduring conceptual central places… Jones has contributed to the anthropology of magic proper; but he has also created an opening relating magic to performance, public education, inchoate delight, and a host of other productive connections.”
Rena Lederman, Princeton University
"Jones’ fascinating study shows how not only disenchanted entertainment magic and enchanted mediumistic rituals, but also—and by extension—the anthropological theories that purport to encompass them are related through the notion of skillful tricks…I therefore read Jones’ eye-opening work on comparative anthropology as a major contribution to an anthropology of comparison.”
Martin Zillinger, University of Cologne
“Jones argues that illusionists shaped the anthropology of magic. In developing magic as an amusing pastime for spectators cognizant of being tricked, and in texts and displays that explicitly duplicated or provided explanations for myriad acts purporting to be supernatural, illusionists helped to lead anthropologists down an epistemological garden path…Jones offers a crucial contribution to understanding how some of these associations formed.”
Margaret J. Wiener, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
"Jones argues ‘magic’ has played a central role in anthropological theorizing, highlighting the supposed irrationalities of non-Western cultures…Jones extracts from this analysis a historical dialectic of analogy and disanalogy both within the magic institutions of single cultures and in comparisons between whole societies. An…excellent ethnohistory.”
Mark S. Mosko, Australian National University
"Scholars of religion interested in the development of the idea of magic will appreciate this book. . ."
Religious Studies Review
Table of Contents
Introduction: Dangerous Doubles
Chapter 1: The War on Miracles
Chapter 2: Disanalogy
Chapter 3: Conjuring Equivalences
Chapter 4: Counteranalogy
Chapter 5: An Anthropologist among the Spirits
Chapter 6: The Magic of Analogy
Chapter 7: Meta-Analogy, or, Once More with Meaning
Conclusion: Regimes of Enchantment