"Fasolt argues that all historical study inevitable is limited and distorted, in that it rests on historians’ mostly unexamined political values and beliefs about time, eternity, truth, meaning, freedom, and responsibility. By showing how our political beliefs determine how we understand the past and the present and how we use this understanding to make our choices about the future, Fasolt argues that ’the study of history is in and of itself a form of political activity’ and ’a dangerous form of knowledge.’ . . . He illustrates his argument through an intriguing exploration of the writings of a significant early modern German political theorist and polymath, Hermann Conring (1606-81), especially Conring’s interpretation of the Roman law doctrines of Bartolus of Sassoferrato (1313/14-1357). This erudite, challenging, and highly readable exploration of the limits of historical study opens many controversial and rewarding vistas for historians and philosophers of history alike."

Choice

“In The Limits of History, Constantin Fasolt engages in traditional history in order to illustrate its limitations. The main subject of his book is Hermann Conring (1606-1681), a German historian who is best known for his argument against both the universality of Roman law and the notion that the Holy Roman Emperor held authority to rule the world. . . . History is more than just a form of knowledge. According to Fasolt, it is designed to uphold the modern belief that humans are free and independent agents and their actions determine the course of the past. . . . Thus, history is a form of self-assertion and is tantamount to taking sides by insisting on a certain order and eliminating rival orders.”

Amy R. Sims | History Teacher

“For Constantine Fasolt, the limits of history can be found not by a customary analysis of historical methodology but only by the study of history’s foundational event, the historical revolution in the period between the Renaissance and the Enlightenment. That revolution was the key force in replacing the world of the Middle Ages dominated by custom, tradition, and universalism with one marked by liberty and its manifestations: the self-assertion, autonomy, and sovereignty of individuals and states. . . . Put simplistically, the medieval and modern worlds are separated by a categorical gap.”

Ernst Breisach | American Historical Review

“Some knowledge of the past is possible, and we can still differentiate good from bad history by using all the techniques established by the profession over the course of hundreds of years. But what is impossible is to divide the past from the present. To have demonstrated this conclusively is this book’s major achievement, and Fasolt does so in beautiful language. The volume contains many sentences which practitioners of history should write down and keep before their eyes when practicing their craft.”

German History

“Constantin Fasolt has written a brilliant critique of historical reasoning that lays bare the assumptions (and hence the limits) of all modern attempts to describe and decode the past. History as we know it, as Fasolt shows, is a form of self-assertion, a political action by which the past is first separated from the present and then treated as if immutable and sacred. In addition to this major theoretical insight, this book also contributes to our appreciation of the too little known German polymath, Hermann Conring, whose work exemplifies and clarifies Fasolt’s point. In the process we learn to see our autonomy and modernity itself bound up in the revolutionary and irreversible invention of history as a discipline. What a great book!”

H. C. Erik Midelfort, University of Virginia

“Fasolt’s erudite, engaging, and wonderfully astute reading of Hermann Conring’s interpretation of Roman law results in a compelling argument that will make us rethink both the origins and the limits of historical consciousness. This is a brilliant contribution to contemporary discussions of history.”

Dipesh Chakrabarty, University of Chicago

“The Limits of History is a work of stunning originality. This is intellectual history of the highest order.”

Allan Megill, University of Virginia