“A challenging and original book. . . . [Ramazani’s] examples are so captivating and illustrative that both specialists and general readers will enjoy reading [A Transnational Poetics] and will immediately recognise the importance of the book’s contribution to both the field of twentieth and twenty-first century poetry and transatlantic studies.”

Journal of Transatlantic Studies

“Ramazani’s is a rich book, full of methodological insights and dazzlingly eclectic in the range of poets it presents, from all quarters of the Anglophone world.”

American Literature

“A volume breathtaking in its global scope and critical incisiveness. The spectrum of issues and poets treated in this book is nothing short of stunning….Given his enormous cross-cultural, cross-temporal breadth, it is all the more impressive that Ramazani is also adept at analyzing stylistic devices in individual poems—language, structure, imagery, voice, rhythm, allusion, and the like. Yet he grounds this analysis too in the writers’ transnational contexts….Whether on the global or the textual plane, Jahan Ramazani’s combination of multicultural erudition, keen insight, and critical ingenuity renders this book a masterful resource that will be consulted for decades.”

ACLA, Harry Levin Prize Citation, 2011 winner

“A Transnational Poetics ought to be required reading for any scholar of modern and contemporary poetry in English.”

Comparative Literature Studies

“The salient version of transnational cultural studies Ramazani advances will appeal to poetry critics as well as scholars working in a broad range of fields who are concerned with intercultural dynamics and the relationship between political and aesthetic structures.”

Journal of Modern Literature

“In A Transnational Poetics, Jahan Ramazani continues to address an obvious but persistent imbalance in the American academy’s understanding of world Anglophone literature. A distinguished success.”

Michael North, University of California, Los Angeles

“With a wide scope and with vigor, Ramazani argues that these modern and contemporary poets are not only syncretic, inventive, and worth reading, they are also transnational: they don’t make sense unless we keep in mind their responses to conditions and traditions in more than one country. He is right, and his claim is important because it gives the academy good thematic reasons to pay attention to the formal inventions for which these poets should be known.”

Stephen Burt, Harvard University