The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning
256 pages
|
16 figures, 45 tables
|
6 x 9
|
© 2014
- Contents
- Review Quotes
Table of Contents

Contents
Acknowledgments
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Voters and Negativity, and Why the Media Can’t Help
with Stefan Mancevski
Chapter 3 What Do Voters Think? Social Desirability and Attitudes about Negativity
Chapter 4 Examining Voter Response to Real Campaign Ads
Chapter 5 Modeling Negativity
Chapter 6 That Ad Said What? The Importance of Ad Credibility
Chapter 7 How the Possibility of Lies Damages Voter Confidence in Negativity
Chapter 8 Conclusion
Appendix A: Details of Video Ads Used in Study 4
Appendix B: Appendix to Chapter 5
Notes
References
Index
Chapter 1 Introduction
Chapter 2 Voters and Negativity, and Why the Media Can’t Help
with Stefan Mancevski
Chapter 3 What Do Voters Think? Social Desirability and Attitudes about Negativity
Chapter 4 Examining Voter Response to Real Campaign Ads
Chapter 5 Modeling Negativity
Chapter 6 That Ad Said What? The Importance of Ad Credibility
Chapter 7 How the Possibility of Lies Damages Voter Confidence in Negativity
Chapter 8 Conclusion
Appendix A: Details of Video Ads Used in Study 4
Appendix B: Appendix to Chapter 5
Notes
References
Index
Review Quotes
John G. Geer, Vanderbilt University
“As America continues to polarize, the frequency of attacks in campaigns will only increase. Despite evidence showing that negativity has many payoffs, there is still substantial doubt about such claims. This book enters that breach with a timely array of data and theory that should find many interested readers.”
Costas Panagopoulos, Fordham University
“Much ink has been spilled to investigate the effects of negativity in politics, but our understanding of this topic remains speculative at best. Readers who are serious about cracking this nut must read this book. Mattes and Redlawsk reconceptualize the concept of negativity in political campaigns, showing that it is not merely instances of one candidate talking about an opponent—as most studies consider it to be—but a far more complicated and multidimensional concept that must take into account substantive content. Readers are guaranteed to experience an ‘ah-ha!’ moment at least a few times.”
Washington Times
“There’s no question that a negative association with politics exists in the United States and other nations. Yet, the waves of negativity many people claim to dislike in campaigning may not be as vilified as we’ve been led to believe. Mattes and Redlawsk’s new book attempts to shift academic research and popular thinking on this important subject.”
Politico
“The campaign ads from 2012 were more negative than the ads in 2008, 2008’s were more negative than 2004’s and, you guessed it, 2004’s more negative than 2000’s. But far from disparaging the form, . . . I celebrate it. Negative campaigning is a genuine positive for democracy. I come to my understanding from paging through a new book, The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning, by Kyle Mattes and David P. Redlawsk.”
Public Opinion Quarterly
“What is the appropriate response to the coming deluge of negativity? Mattes and Redlawsk make a convincing case that the most appropriate response is ‘so what?’ . . . The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning is both engaging and important. In casting a more nuanced lens on one of the most maligned forms of political communication, this book should lead scholars to new agendas and research questions.”
Choice
“Students of campaigns and elections will find this book informative, and practitioners will benefit from the many examples that support the sophisticated political science. . . . Recommended.”
Congress and the Presidency
“The Positive Case for Negative Campaigning is a useful and needed reminder not to slide into the habit of bemoaning negative campaigning. It is a trap that is easy to fall into, especially given media narratives about negative campaigns. But Mattes and Redlawsk examine the topic with fresh eyes, pointing out that it is as easy to lie about oneself in a positive ad as it is to lie about an opponent in a negative ad. At the same time, the book is a useful reminder that voters are more competent than we sometimes may believe.”
For more information, or to order this book, please visit https://press.uchicago.edu
Google preview here
Political Science: American Government and Politics | Political Behavior and Public Opinion
You may purchase this title at these fine bookstores. Outside the USA, see our international sales information.