Skip to main content
Shopping cart: items Cart

Doctors and Demonstrators

How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain, and Canada

Doctors and Demonstrators

How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain, and Canada

Since Roe v. Wade, abortion has continued to be a divisive political issue in the United States. In contrast, it has remained primarily a medical issue in Britain and Canada despite the countries’ shared heritage. Doctors and Demonstrators looks beyond simplistic cultural or religious explanations to find out why abortion politics and policies differ so dramatically in these otherwise similar countries.
 
Drew Halfmann argues that political institutions are the key. In the United States, federalism, judicial review, and a private health care system contributed to the public definition of abortion as an individual right rather than a medical necessity. Meanwhile, Halfmann explains, the porous structure of American political parties gave pro-choice and pro-life groups the opportunity to move the issue onto the political agenda. A groundbreaking study of the complex legal and political factors behind the evolution of abortion policy, Doctors and Demonstrators will be vital for anyone trying to understand this contentious issue.

336 pages | 27 halftones | 6 x 9 | © 2011

Political Science: Comparative Politics

Sociology: Social Change, Social Movements, Political Sociology

Reviews

Doctors and Demonstrators is an innovative, thorough, and expertly designed work of political analysis. There is much to admire here, but one of the most important elements is the use of a comparative historical approach to an issue of legal policy. Halfmann sets up an intriguing puzzle—why are abortion politics in the US, Britain, and Canada so different?—and provides a subtle yet clear and powerful explanation.”

John Skrentny, University of California, San Diego

Doctors and Demonstrators situates struggles over abortion in comparative context, showing the importance of different ways in which the medical profession, politics, and law affect each other. Drew Halfmann’s analysis is an important contribution to sociology and a source of timely insight that goes beyond the specifics of abortion issues to controversies over health care generally.”

Craig Calhoun, New York University

“The book is laid out in an intellectually intuitive, though perhaps untraditional, way, which allows Halfmann to emphasize his theory clearly throughout. . . . It puts what has for many decades been a fiery political debate in the United States into a larger political perspective.”

World Medical and Health Policy

Table of Contents

List of Abbreviations
Acknowledgments

1        Introduction

Part One        Abortion Reforms of the Long 1960s
2        The Reforms and Their Roots
3        Medical Interests and Priorities

Part Two        After Reform
4        Abortion Services
5        The Politicization of Abortion
6        Policy Change after Reform
7        Political Institutions and Abortion Policy

References

Appendix 1        Statements on Abortion in American Party Platforms, 1972–2008
Appendix 2        U.S. Supreme Court Cases on Abortion
Appendix 3        Abortion Attitudes in the United States and Britain
Appendix 4        Abortion Funding and Provision in the United States, Britain, and Canada, 1970s–2000s
Appendix 5        Abortion Attitudes in the United States, Britain, and Canada, 1975–2004

Notes
Index

Awards

ASA Collective Behavior and Social Movements Section: Charles Tilly Award for Best Book
Won

Pacific Sociological Association: Distinguished Scholarship Award
Won

Be the first to know

Get the latest updates on new releases, special offers, and media highlights when you subscribe to our email lists!

Sign up here for updates about the Press