Audio and Video Examples for
Making It Up Together:
The Art of Collective Improvisation in Balinese Music and Beyond
by Leslie A. Tilley
The audio and video recordings on this website closely track and complement the content of the book Making It Up Together: The Art of Collective Improvisation in Balinese Music and Beyond. Most musical examples in the book have one or more accompanying audio or video tracks; other tracks allow the reader to see longer excerpts of the genres discussed, or elucidate additional relevant musical concepts. All of the videos and some of the audio tracks were performed by Balinese musicians in Bali; their names are listed with each track. Yet, because much of the analysis in the book is small-scale, and the genres discussed are often played at such high tempi, many of the shorter audio examples have been recorded as slower “demo tracks,” played by musicians from Gamelan Galak Tika in Cambridge Massachusetts, as follows:
- Matt Elkins: reyong, kempli, core melody (calung, penyacah, jegogan), gongs
- Andreas Liapis: gangsa, kempli, core melody, gongs
- Emma Terrell: reyong, kempli, core melody, gongs
- Leslie Tilley: kendang, reyong, kempli, ugal, core melody
- Emeric Viani: kendang, reyong, gangsa, kempli, gongs
All audio tracks are demo tracks except where otherwise noted.
Prelude
Chapter 1Figure 1.1. Excerpt of Tama’s improvised lanang playing (p. 30)
Figure 1.2. Collection of Tama’s model lanang patterns (p. 30)
Figure 1.3. Interpretation in Tama’s kendang arja improvisation (p. 31)
Figure 1.4. Recombination of elements from two different model patterns (p. 32)
Figure 1.5. Complex “micro” recombination (p. 32)
Chapter 2Figure 2.2. Baris interlocking empat pattern on reyong, 1st and 3rd positions (p. 53)Figure 2.3. Baris interlocking empat pattern on reyong, 2nd and 4th positions (p. 53)Figure 2.4. Baris interlocking empat pattern on reyong, all players (p. 53)Figure 2.5. Baris interlocking empat pattern on reyong, composite melody (p. 53)Figure 2.6, Four “equivalent” improvised norot melodies (p. 56)
Figure 2.7. The five tones of the gong kebyar’s scale (p. 59)
Gilak gong structure (p. 61)Figure 2.8. End-weighted cycles and beats: the reyong’s composite Baris melody (p. 62)Figure 2.9. Oleg Tumulilingan’s core melody on ugal (p. 66)Oleg’s gong structure (p. 66)Figure 2.11. Oleg Tumulilingan core melody instruments: stratified polyphony (p. 68)Figure 2.12. Polos part in interlocking gangsa melody, Oleg Tumulilingan (p. 70)Figure 2.13. Composite gangsa melody, Oleg Tumulilingan (p. 70)
Figure 2.15. The “base,” Oleg Tumulilingan (p. 75)Figure 2.16. Comparison: composite gangsa melody and reyong “base,” Oleg Tumulilingan (p. 75)Figure 2.17. Static (ngubeng) norot on dung (u) (p. 78)Figure 2.18. dung (u) to ding (i) norot shift (p. 78)Figure 2.19. Kempyung parallel “harmony” tones (p. 79)
Figure 2.20. Gangsa norot in parallel figuration, Oleg Tumulilingan (p. 79)Figure 2.21. Improvised reyong norot, Teruna Jaya (p. 81)
Figure 2.22. Ranges of the reyong (p. 83)
Figure 2.23. Flexible pairings on reyong (p. 84)
Figure 2.24. All core melody shifts (p. 85)
Figure 2.25. Oleg’s core melody (pokok) on calung (p. 85)Figure 2.26. Comparing improvised cells (p. 86)
Chapter 3Figure 3.1. Using kempyung on reyong (p. 95)
Figure 3.2. Kempyung below (p. 95)
Figure 3.3. Blending model notes with kempyung on dang (a) (p. 95)
Figure 3.4. Incorporating rests (p. 97)
Figure 3.5. Inherent patterns (p. 97)Figure 3.6. Improvised patterns using model tones, kempyung, and rests (p. 100)
Figure 3.7. Improvised cells with nonstandard tones (p. 101)
Figure 3.8. The effects of resting on gong (delayed unisons) (p. 103)
Figure 3.9. Delayed unisons, Oleg (p. 104)Figure 3.10. Delayed unison followed by a rest is more wayah (p. 105)
Figure 3.11. The danger of delayed unisons (p. 105)
Figure 3.12. Preparing the delayed unison: upper-neighbor suspension (p. 106)Figure 3.13. Core melody anticipation (p. 107)
Figure 3.14. Core melody anticipations with kempyung and rests (p. 107)
Figure 3.15. Anticipation (p. 108)
Figure 3.16. Suspension (p. 109)
Figure 3.17. Anticipation of the pick-up’s upper neighbor (p. 110)
Figure 3.18. Embellishment techniques recombined (p. 111)
Figure 3.19. Anticipation obscured with a rest (p. 112)
Figure 3.20. Suspension obscured with kempyung (p. 112)
Figure 3.21. Embellishment techniques for flexible timing (p. 113)
Figure 3.22. Ornamentation: mordent (p. 114)
Figure 3.23. Ornamentation: double passing tone (p. 115)
Figure 3.24. Creative pitch substitution (p. 116)
Figure 3.25. Interlocking with creative pitch substitution (p. 116)
Figure 3.26. Static-kinetic switch (p. 119)
Figure 3.27. Wayah patterns with static-kinetic switch (p. 119)
Figure 3.28. Unexplained non-standard tones (p. 120)
Figure 3.29. Unexplained non-standard tones interlocking (empat substitution) (p. 121)
Figure 3.30. Extrapolating the step-wise aesthetic of empat (p. 123)
Figure 3.31. Step-wise empat aesthetic in static-kinetic switch (p. 123)
Figure 3.32. The freedom of stasis (p. 125)
Figure 3.33. “Staying on ding and dong” (p. 126)
Figure 3.35. Improvisation on perceived core melody with decreased motion (p. 127)
Figure 3.36. “Rule-breaking” in Kebyar Jaya Semara (p. 127)
Figure 3.37. Kebyar Jaya Semara melody for increase in perceived core melody motion (p. 128)Figure 3.38. Interlocking with increased core melody motion (p. 128)
Figure 3.39. Oleg’s alternate core melody (p. 130)
Figure 3.40. Empat substitution referencing Oleg’s alternate core melody (p. 130)
Figure 3.41. Parallelism in the core melody for Alit’s new composition (p. 131)Figure 3.42. Improvising on parallelism in the core melody (p. 131)
Chapter 5Figure 5.3. Two of Pak Dewa’s taught wadon patterns (p. 182)
Figure 5.5. Comparing Cok Alit’s lanang with Pak Dewa’s wadon patterns (p. 184)
Figure 5.9. Arja’s cyclic structures (p. 188)
Figure 5.11. Comparing lanang patterns from different teachers (p. 194)
Figure 5.12. Cok Alit’s second lanang pattern, “terbalik” (p. 195)Figure 5.14. Cycling a 2-beat unit (p. 196)
Figure 5.17. Arja’s most basic composite pattern (dasar) (p. 203)Figure 5.18. Basic pattern with right-hand counting strokes (p. 203)
Figure 5.19. Counting-stroke variations of the basic wadon (p. 204)
Figure 5.20. Wadon patterns from Figure 5.19 paired with basic lanang (p. 205)
Figure 5.21. “Rule-abiding” “on-beat, off-beat” rim-stroke use (p. 205)
Figure 5.23. The “on-beat, off-beat” rule: single versus double strokes (p. 207)
Figure 5.24. The “on-beat, off-beat” rule in improvisation (p. 207)
Figure 5.26. Interlocking drumming for Baris is precomposed (p. 208)
Figure 5.27. Pak Tut’s fixed Dag-Tut interactions, Apuan style (p. 209)
Figure 5.28. Cok Alit’s Tut (T) placement (p. 210)
Figure 5.29. Pak Dewa’s on-beat Dag (D) placement (p. 210)
Figure 5.30. Pak Dewa’s freer use of Dag (D) in off-beat positions (p. 211)Figure 5.31. Cok Alit’s 2nd-subdivision Tut (T) strokes are often late in a cycle (p. 211)
Figure 5.32. Ngegongin in legong (p. 212)Figure 5.33. Increased activity and bass-stroke use leading to gong, 8-beat pattern (p. 213)Figure 5.34. Increased activity leading to gong in 4-beat patterns (p. 213)
Figure 5.35. Signposting ngegongin in 4- and 8-beat cycles (p. 214)
Figure 5.36. Signposting ngegongin in a 2-beat cyclic structure (p. 215)
Figure 5.37. Beats 4-8 of Pak Dewa and Cok Alit’s precomposed interaction (p. 216)Chapter 6
Figure 6.1. Relative level of ramé in taught patterns from different drummers (p. 224)
Figure 6.2. Pak Tama’s taught tabuh telu patterns, lanang (p. 225)
Figure 6.3. Pak Tama’s tabuh dua patterns are more ramé (p. 226)
Figure 6.4. Improvisation for batel, Pak Tama (p. 227)
Figure 6.6. Pak Dewa’s taught patterns balance sparseness with ramé-ness (p. 229)
Figure 6.7. Commonly used taught patterns too sparse for batel (p. 234)
Figure 6.10. Kredek’s patterns for tabuh dua (p. 244)
Figure 6.11. Interpretation, lanang (p. 247)
Figure 6.12. Recombination: pattern displacement (p. 248)
Figure 6.13. Increasing recombination of gesture elements (p. 248)
Figure 6.14. Larger-scale recombination of pattern elements (p. 249)
Figure 6.15. More complex recombination of pattern elements (p. 249)
Figure 6.16. Recombination of segments from multiple taught patterns (p. 250)
Figure 6.17. Recombination through elision of multiple taught patterns (p. 250)
Figure 6.18. Asymmetric recombination (p. 251)
Figure 6.19. Cross-rhythmic patterns from Hood’s analyses (p. 252)
Figure 6.20. Cross-rhythm in taught lanang patterns (p. 253)
Figure 6.21. Cross-rhythm in Pak Tut’s favored patterns (p. 253)
Figure 6.22. Recombination creating cross-rhythm (p. 254)
Figure 6.23. Cross-rhythm in Cok Alit’s lanang improvisation (p. 255)
Figure 6.24. Cross-rhythm in Pak Dewa’s wadon improvisation (p. 255)
Figure 6.25. Cross-rhythm Blending expansion and recombination (p. 256)
Figure 6.26. Improvised pattern from Figure 6.25 in context: interpretation, recombination, and expansion (p. 257)
Figure 6.31. Chance interactions in improvised performance (p. 262)
Figure 6.32. Dag-Tut interactions in improvised performance (p. 263)
|