<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Chicago Press: New Titles in History of Science</title>
    <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/rss/books/RSS.xml</link>
    <description>The latest new books in History of Science</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Demands of the Day</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/D/bo15417744.html</link>
      <description>Demands of the Day asks about the logical standards and forms that should guide ethical and experimental anthropology in the twenty-first century. Anthropologists Paul Rabinow and Anthony Stavrianakis do so by taking up Max Weber’s notion of the “demands of the day.” Just as the demand of the day for anthropology decades ago consisted of thinking about fieldwork, today, they argue, the demand is to examine what happens after, how the experiences of fieldwork are gathered, curated, narrated, and ultimately made available for an anthropological practice that moves beyond mere ethnographic description.  Rabinow and Stavrianakis draw on experiences from an innovative set of anthropological experiments that investigated how and whether the human and biological sciences could be brought into a mutually enriching relationship. Conceptualizing the anthropological and philosophic ramifications of these inquiries, they offer a bold challenge to contemporary anthropology to undertake a more rigorous examination of its own practices, blind spots, and capacities, in order to meet the demands of our day.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Demands of the Day&lt;/i&gt; asks about the logical standards and forms that should guide ethical and experimental anthropology in the twenty-first century. Anthropologists Paul Rabinow and Anthony Stavrianakis do so by taking up Max Weber&amp;rsquo;s notion of the &amp;ldquo;demands of the day.&amp;rdquo; Just as the demand of the day for anthropology decades ago consisted of thinking about fieldwork, today, they argue, the demand is to examine what happens &lt;i&gt;after&lt;/i&gt;, how the experiences of fieldwork are gathered, curated, narrated, and ultimately made available for an anthropological practice that moves beyond mere ethnographic description.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; Rabinow and Stavrianakis draw on experiences from an innovative set of anthropological experiments that investigated how and whether the human and biological sciences could be brought into a mutually enriching relationship. Conceptualizing the anthropological and philosophic ramifications of these inquiries, they offer a bold challenge to contemporary anthropology to undertake a more rigorous examination of its own practices, blind spots, and capacities, in order to meet the demands of our day.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/03/9780226036915.jpeg" length="27496" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Anthropology: General Anthropology</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Philosophy: General Philosophy</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Paul Rabinow; Anthony Stavrianakis</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226036885</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Trying Biology</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo15288701.html</link>
      <description>In Trying Biology, Adam R. Shapiro convincingly dispels many conventional assumptions about the 1925 Scopes “monkey” trial. Most view it as an event driven primarily by a conflict between science and religion. Countering this, Shapiro shows the importance of timing: the Scopes trial occurred at a crucial moment in the history of biology textbook publishing, education reform in Tennessee, and progressive school reform across the country. He places the trial in this broad context—alongside American Protestant antievolution sentiment—and in doing so sheds new light on the trial and the historical relationship of science and religion in America.&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;For the first time we see how religious objections to evolution became a prevailing concern to the American textbook industry even before the Scopes trial began. Shapiro explores both the development of biology textbooks leading up to the trial and the ways in which the textbook industry created new books and presented them as “responses” to the trial. Today, the controversy continues over textbook warning labels, making Shapiro’s study—particularly as it plays out in one of America’s most famous trials—an original contribution to a timely discussion.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;In &lt;i&gt;Trying Biology&lt;/i&gt;, Adam R. Shapiro convincingly dispels many conventional assumptions about the 1925 Scopes &amp;ldquo;monkey&amp;rdquo; trial. Most view it as an event driven primarily by a conflict between science and religion. Countering this, Shapiro shows the importance of timing: the Scopes trial occurred at a crucial moment in the history of biology textbook publishing, education reform in Tennessee, and progressive school reform across the country. He places the trial in this broad context&amp;mdash;alongside American Protestant antievolution sentiment&amp;mdash;and in doing so sheds new light on the trial and the historical relationship of science and religion in America.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;For the first time we see how religious objections to evolution became a prevailing concern to the American textbook industry even before the Scopes trial began. Shapiro explores both the development of biology textbooks leading up to the trial and the ways in which the textbook industry created new books and presented them as &amp;ldquo;responses&amp;rdquo; to the trial. Today, the controversy continues over textbook warning labels, making Shapiro&amp;rsquo;s study&amp;mdash;particularly as it plays out in one of America&amp;rsquo;s most famous trials&amp;mdash;an original contribution to a timely discussion.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/02/9780226029597.jpeg" length="17890" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>History: American History</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Law and Legal Studies: Legal History</category>
      <category>Library Science and Publishing: Publishing</category>
      <category>Religion: Religion and Society</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Adam R. Shapiro</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226029450</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nature and Nurture of Love</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/N/bo15112774.html</link>
      <description>The notion that maternal care and love will determine a child’s emotional well-being and future personality has become ubiquitous. In countless stories and movies we find that the problems of the protagonists—anything from the fear of romantic commitment to serial killing—stem from their troubled relationships with their mothers during childhood. How did we come to hold these views about the determinant power of mother love over an individual’s emotional development? And what does this vision of mother love entail for children and mothers?&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;In The Nature and Nurture of Love, Marga Vicedo examines scientific views about children’s emotional needs and mother love from World War II until the 1970s, paying particular attention to John Bowlby’s ethological theory of attachment behavior. Vicedo tracks the development of Bowlby’s work as well as the interdisciplinary research that he used to support his theory, including Konrad Lorenz’s studies of imprinting in geese, Harry Harlow’s experiments with monkeys, and Mary Ainsworth’s observations of children and mothers in Uganda and the United States. Vicedo’s historical analysis reveals that important psychoanalysts and animal researchers opposed the project of turning emotions into biological instincts. Despite those criticisms, she argues that attachment theory was paramount in turning mother love into a biological need. This shift introduced a new justification for the prescriptive role of biology in human affairs and had profound—and negative—consequences for mothers and for the valuation of mother love.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;The notion that maternal care and love will determine a child&amp;rsquo;s emotional well-being and future personality has become ubiquitous. In countless stories and movies we find that the problems of the protagonists&amp;mdash;anything from the fear of romantic commitment to serial killing&amp;mdash;stem from their troubled relationships with their mothers during childhood. How did we come to hold these views about the determinant power of mother love over an individual&amp;rsquo;s emotional development? And what does this vision of mother love entail for children and mothers?&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;In &lt;i&gt;The Nature and Nurture of Love&lt;/i&gt;, Marga Vicedo examines scientific views about children&amp;rsquo;s emotional needs and mother love from World War II until the 1970s, paying particular attention to John Bowlby&amp;rsquo;s ethological theory of attachment behavior. Vicedo tracks the development of Bowlby&amp;rsquo;s work as well as the interdisciplinary research that he used to support his theory, including Konrad Lorenz&amp;rsquo;s studies of imprinting in geese, Harry Harlow&amp;rsquo;s experiments with monkeys, and Mary Ainsworth&amp;rsquo;s observations of children and mothers in Uganda and the United States. Vicedo&amp;rsquo;s historical analysis reveals that important psychoanalysts and animal researchers opposed the project of turning emotions into biological instincts. Despite those criticisms, she argues that attachment theory was paramount in turning mother love into a biological need. This shift introduced a new justification for the prescriptive role of biology in human affairs and had profound&amp;mdash;and negative&amp;mdash;consequences for mothers and for the valuation of mother love.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/02/9780226020556.jpeg" length="17314" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Biological Sciences: Behavioral Biology</category>
      <category>History: American History</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Marga Vicedo</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226020556</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fear of Food</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/F/bo12778615.html</link>
      <description>There may be no greater source of anxiety for Americans  today than  the question of what to eat and drink. Are eggs the perfect  protein, or  are they cholesterol bombs? &amp;#160;Is red wine good for my heart  or bad for my  liver? Will pesticides, additives, and processed foods  kill me? &amp;#160;Here  with some very rare and very welcome advice is food  historian Harvey  Levenstein: Stop worrying!In Fear of Food Levenstein  reveals the people and interests  who have created and exploited these  worries, causing an extraordinary  number of Americans to allow fear to  trump pleasure in dictating their  food choices. He tells of the  prominent scientists who first warned  about deadly germs and poisons in  foods, and their successors who  charged that processing foods robs  them of life-giving vitamins and  minerals. These include Nobel  Prize–winner Eli Metchnikoff, who advised  that yogurt would enable  people to live to be 140 by killing the  life-threatening germs in their  intestines, and Elmer McCollum, the  “discoverer” of vitamins, who  tailored his warnings about vitamin  deficiencies to suit the food  producers who funded him. Levenstein also  highlights how large food  companies have taken advantage of these  concerns by marketing their  products to combat the fear of the moment.  Such examples include the  co-opting of the “natural foods” movement,  which grew out of the belief  that inhabitants of a remote Himalayan  Shangri-la enjoyed remarkable  health and longevity by avoiding the very  kinds of processed food these  corporations produced, and the  physiologist Ancel Keys, originator of  the Mediterranean Diet, who  provided the basis for a powerful coalition  of scientists, doctors, food  producers, and others to convince  Americans that high-fat foods were  deadly.In Fear of Food, Levenstein  offers a much-needed voice of  reason; he expertly questions these  stories of constantly changing  advice to reveal that there are no  hard-and-fast facts when it comes to  eating. With this book, he hopes  to free us from the fears that cloud so  many of our food choices and  allow us to finally rediscover the joys of  eating something just  because it tastes good.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;There may be no greater source of anxiety for Americans  today than  the question of what to eat and drink. Are eggs the perfect  protein, or  are they cholesterol bombs? &amp;#160;Is red wine good for my heart  or bad for my  liver? Will pesticides, additives, and processed foods  kill me? &amp;#160;Here  with some very rare and very welcome advice is food  historian Harvey  Levenstein: Stop worrying!&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;In &lt;i&gt;Fear of Food &lt;/i&gt;Levenstein  reveals the people and interests  who have created and exploited these  worries, causing an extraordinary  number of Americans to allow fear to  trump pleasure in dictating their  food choices. He tells of the  prominent scientists who first warned  about deadly germs and poisons in  foods, and their successors who  charged that processing foods robs  them of life-giving vitamins and  minerals. These include Nobel  Prize&amp;ndash;winner Eli Metchnikoff, who advised  that yogurt would enable  people to live to be 140 by killing the  life-threatening germs in their  intestines, and Elmer McCollum, the  &amp;ldquo;discoverer&amp;rdquo; of vitamins, who  tailored his warnings about vitamin  deficiencies to suit the food  producers who funded him. Levenstein also  highlights how large food  companies have taken advantage of these  concerns by marketing their  products to combat the fear of the moment.  Such examples include the  co-opting of the &amp;ldquo;natural foods&amp;rdquo; movement,  which grew out of the belief  that inhabitants of a remote Himalayan  Shangri-la enjoyed remarkable  health and longevity by avoiding the very  kinds of processed food these  corporations produced, and the  physiologist Ancel Keys, originator of  the Mediterranean Diet, who  provided the basis for a powerful coalition  of scientists, doctors, food  producers, and others to convince  Americans that high-fat foods were  deadly.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;In &lt;i&gt;Fear of Food, &lt;/i&gt;Levenstein  offers a much-needed voice of  reason; he expertly questions these  stories of constantly changing  advice to reveal that there are no  hard-and-fast facts when it comes to  eating. With this book, he hopes  to free us from the fears that cloud so  many of our food choices and  allow us to finally rediscover the joys of  eating something just  because it tastes good.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/47/9780226473741.jpeg" length="16778" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Culture Studies</category>
      <category>History: American History</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Food and Gastronomy</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Harvey Levenstein</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226054902</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Genentech</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/G/bo8169877.html</link>
      <description>In the fall of 1980, Genentech, Inc., a little-known California genetic engineering company, became the overnight darling of Wall Street, raising over $38 million in its initial public stock offering. Lacking marketed products or substantial profit, the firm nonetheless saw its share price escalate from $35 to $89 in the first few minutes of trading, at that point the largest gain in stock market history. Coming at a time of economic recession and declining technological competitiveness in the United States, the event provoked banner headlines and ignited a period of speculative frenzy over biotechnology as a revolutionary means for creating new and better kinds of pharmaceuticals, untold profit, and a possible solution to national economic malaise.&amp;#160;Drawing from an unparalleled collection of interviews with early biotech players, Sally Smith Hughes offers the first book-length history of this pioneering company, depicting Genentech’s improbable creation, precarious youth, and ascent to immense prosperity. Hughes provides intimate portraits of the people significant to Genentech’s science and business, including cofounders Herbert Boyer and Robert Swanson, and in doing so sheds new light on how personality affects the growth of science. By placing Genentech’s founders, followers, opponents, victims, and beneficiaries in context, Hughes also demonstrates how science interacts with commercial and legal interests and university research, and with government regulation, venture capital, and commercial profits.&amp;#160;Integrating the scientific, the corporate, the contextual, and the personal, Genentech tells the story of biotechnology as it is not often told, as a risky and improbable entrepreneurial venture that had to overcome a number of powerful forces working against it. &amp;#160;</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;In the fall of 1980, Genentech, Inc., a little-known California genetic engineering company, became the overnight darling of Wall Street, raising over $38 million in its initial public stock offering. Lacking marketed products or substantial profit, the firm nonetheless saw its share price escalate from $35 to $89 in the first few minutes of trading, at that point the largest gain in stock market history. Coming at a time of economic recession and declining technological competitiveness in the United States, the event provoked banner headlines and ignited a period of speculative frenzy over biotechnology as a revolutionary means for creating new and better kinds of pharmaceuticals, untold profit, and a possible solution to national economic malaise.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Drawing from an unparalleled collection of interviews with early biotech players, Sally Smith Hughes offers the first book-length history of this pioneering company, depicting Genentech&amp;rsquo;s improbable creation, precarious youth, and ascent to immense prosperity. Hughes provides intimate portraits of the people significant to Genentech&amp;rsquo;s science and business, including cofounders Herbert Boyer and Robert Swanson, and in doing so sheds new light on how personality affects the growth of science. By placing Genentech&amp;rsquo;s founders, followers, opponents, victims, and beneficiaries in context, Hughes also demonstrates how science interacts with commercial and legal interests and university research, and with government regulation, venture capital, and commercial profits.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Integrating the scientific, the corporate, the contextual, and the personal, &lt;i&gt;Genentech&lt;/i&gt; tells the story of biotechnology as it is not often told, as a risky and improbable entrepreneurial venture that had to overcome a number of powerful forces working against it. &amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/35/9780226359182.jpeg" length="39377" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Biological Sciences: Biochemistry</category>
      <category>Economics and Business: Business--Business Economics and Management Studies</category>
      <category>History: History of Technology</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Sally Smith Hughes</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226045511</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Nazi Symbiosis</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/N/bo9397066.html</link>
      <description>The Faustian bargain&amp;#8212;in which an individual or group collaborates with an evil entity in order to obtain knowledge, power, or material gain&amp;#8212;is perhaps best exemplified by the alliance between world-renowned human geneticists and the Nazi state. Under the swastika, German scientists descended into the moral abyss, perpetrating heinous medical crimes at Auschwitz and at euthanasia hospitals. But why did biomedical researchers accept such a bargain?The Nazi Symbiosis offers a nuanced account of the myriad ways human heredity and Nazi politics reinforced each other before and during the Third Reich. Exploring the ethical and professional consequences for the scientists involved as well as the political ramifications for Nazi racial policies, Sheila Faith Weiss places genetics and eugenics in their larger international context. In questioning whether the motives that propelled German geneticists were different from the compromises that researchers from other countries and eras face, Weiss extends her argument into our modern moment, as we confront the promises and perils of genomic medicine today.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;p&gt;The Faustian bargain&amp;#8212;in which an individual or group collaborates with an evil entity in order to obtain knowledge, power, or material gain&amp;#8212;is perhaps best exemplified by the alliance between world-renowned human geneticists and the Nazi state. Under the swastika, German scientists descended into the moral abyss, perpetrating heinous medical crimes at Auschwitz and at euthanasia hospitals. But why did biomedical researchers accept such a bargain?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;i&gt;The Nazi Symbiosis&lt;/i&gt; offers a nuanced account of the myriad ways human heredity and Nazi politics reinforced each other before and during the Third Reich. Exploring the ethical and professional consequences for the scientists involved as well as the political ramifications for Nazi racial policies, Sheila Faith Weiss places genetics and eugenics in their larger international context. In questioning whether the motives that propelled German geneticists were different from the compromises that researchers from other countries and eras face, Weiss extends her argument into our modern moment, as we confront the promises and perils of genomic medicine today.&lt;/p&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/05/9780226055718.jpeg" length="11949" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>History: European History</category>
      <category>History: Military History</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Medical Science</category>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Sheila Faith Weiss</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226055718</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Curiosity</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/C/bo15703784.html</link>
      <description>With the recent landing of the Mars rover Curiosity, it seems safe to assume that the idea of being curious is alive and well in modern science—that it’s not merely encouraged but is seen as an essential component of the scientific mission. Yet there was a time when curiosity was condemned. Neither Pandora nor Eve could resist the dangerous allure of unanswered questions, and all knowledge wasn’t equal—for millennia it was believed that there were some things we should not try to know. In the late sixteenth century this attitude began to change dramatically, and in Curiosity: How Science Became Interested in Everything, Philip Ball investigates how curiosity first became sanctioned—when it changed from a vice to a virtue and how it became permissible to ask any and every question about the world.&amp;#160;Looking closely at the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries, Ball vividly brings to life the age when modern science began, a time that spans the lives of Galileo and Isaac Newton. In this entertaining and illuminating account of the rise of science as we know it, Ball tells of scientists both legendary and lesser known, from Copernicus and Kepler to Robert Boyle, as well as the inventions and technologies that were inspired by curiosity itself, such as the telescope and the microscope. The so-called Scientific Revolution is often told as a story of great geniuses illuminating the world with flashes of inspiration. But Curiosity reveals a more complex story, in which the liberation—and subsequent taming—of curiosity was linked to magic, religion, literature, travel, trade, and empire. Ball also asks what has become of curiosity today: how it functions in science, how it is spun and packaged for consumption, how well it is being sustained, and how the changing shape of science influences the kinds of questions it may continue to ask.&amp;#160;Though proverbial wisdom tell us that it was through curiosity that our innocence was lost, that has not deterred us. Instead, it has been completely the contrary: today we spend vast sums trying to reconstruct the first instants of creation in particle accelerators, out of a pure desire to know. Ball refuses to let us take this desire for granted, and this book is a perfect homage to such an inquisitive attitude.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;With the recent landing of the Mars rover Curiosity, it seems safe to assume that the idea of being curious is alive and well in modern science&amp;mdash;that it&amp;rsquo;s not merely encouraged but is seen as an essential component of the scientific mission. Yet there was a time when curiosity was condemned. Neither Pandora nor Eve could resist the dangerous allure of unanswered questions, and all knowledge wasn&amp;rsquo;t equal&amp;mdash;for millennia it was believed that there were some things we should not try to know. In the late sixteenth century this attitude began to change dramatically, and in &lt;i&gt;Curiosity: &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;How Science Became Interested in Everything, &lt;/i&gt;Philip Ball investigates how curiosity first became sanctioned&amp;mdash;when it changed from a vice to a virtue and how it became permissible to ask any and every question about the world.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Looking closely at the sixteenth through eighteenth centuries, Ball vividly brings to life the age when modern science began, a time that spans the lives of Galileo and Isaac Newton. In this entertaining and illuminating account of the rise of science as we know it, Ball tells of scientists both legendary and lesser known, from Copernicus and Kepler to Robert Boyle, as well as the inventions and technologies that were inspired by curiosity itself, such as the telescope and the microscope. The so-called Scientific Revolution is often told as a story of great geniuses illuminating the world with flashes of inspiration. But &lt;i&gt;Curiosity&lt;/i&gt; reveals a more complex story, in which the liberation&amp;mdash;and subsequent taming&amp;mdash;of curiosity was linked to magic, religion, literature, travel, trade, and empire. Ball also asks what has become of curiosity today: how it functions in science, how it is spun and packaged for consumption, how well it is being sustained, and how the changing shape of science influences the kinds of questions it may continue to ask.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Though proverbial wisdom tell us that it was through curiosity that our innocence was lost, that has not deterred us. Instead, it has been completely the contrary: today we spend vast sums trying to reconstruct the first instants of creation in particle accelerators, out of a pure desire to &lt;i&gt;know&lt;/i&gt;. Ball refuses to let us take this desire for granted, and this book is a perfect homage to such an inquisitive attitude.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/04/9780226045795.jpeg" length="58728" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>History: History of Ideas</category>
      <category>History: General History</category>
      <category>History: History of Technology</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Physical Sciences: History and Philosophy of Physical Sciences</category>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Philip Ball</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226045795</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Genomes and What to Make of Them</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/G/bo5705879.html</link>
      <description>The announcement in 2003 that the Human Genome Project had completed its map of the entire human genome was heralded as a stunning scientific breakthrough: our first full picture of the basic building blocks of human life. Since then, boasts about the benefits&amp;#8212;and warnings of the dangers&amp;#8212;of genomics have remained front-page news, with everyone agreeing that genomics has the potential to radically alter life as we know it.For the nonscientist, the claims and counterclaims are dizzying&amp;#8212;what does it really mean to understand the genome? Barry Barnes and John Dupr&amp;#233; offer an answer to that question and much more in Genomes and What to Make of Them, a clear and lively account of the genomic revolution and its promise. The book opens with a brief history of the science of genetics and genomics, from Mendel to Watson and Crick and all the way up to Craig Venter; from there the authors delve into the use of genomics in determining evolutionary paths&amp;#8212;and what it can tell us, for example, about how far we really have come from our ape ancestors. Barnes and Dupr&amp;#233; then consider both the power and risks of genetics, from the economic potential of plant genomes to overblown claims that certain human genes can be directly tied to such traits as intelligence or homosexuality. Ultimately, the authors argue, we are now living with a new knowledge as powerful in its way as nuclear physics&amp;shy;, and the stark choices that face us&amp;#8212;between biological warfare and gene therapy, a new eugenics or a new agricultural revolution&amp;#8212;will demand the full engagement of both scientists and citizens.&amp;#160;Written in straightforward language but without denying the complexity of the issues, Genomes and What to Make of Them is both an up-to-date primer and a blueprint for the future.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;&lt;div&gt;The announcement in 2003 that the Human Genome Project had completed its map of the entire human genome was heralded as a stunning scientific breakthrough: our first full picture of the basic building blocks of human life. Since then, boasts about the benefits&amp;#8212;and warnings of the dangers&amp;#8212;of genomics have remained front-page news, with everyone agreeing that genomics has the potential to radically alter life as we know it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the nonscientist, the claims and counterclaims are dizzying&amp;#8212;what does it really mean to understand the genome? Barry Barnes and John Dupr&amp;#233; offer an answer to that question and much more in &lt;i&gt;Genomes and What to Make of Them&lt;/i&gt;, a clear and lively account of the genomic revolution and its promise. The book opens with a brief history of the science of genetics and genomics, from Mendel to Watson and Crick and all the way up to Craig Venter; from there the authors delve into the use of genomics in determining evolutionary paths&amp;#8212;and what it can tell us, for example, about how far we really have come from our ape ancestors. Barnes and Dupr&amp;#233; then consider both the power and risks of genetics, from the economic potential of plant genomes to overblown claims that certain human genes can be directly tied to such traits as intelligence or homosexuality. Ultimately, the authors argue, we are now living with a new knowledge as powerful in its way as nuclear physics&amp;shy;, and the stark choices that face us&amp;#8212;between biological warfare and gene therapy, a new eugenics or a new agricultural revolution&amp;#8212;will demand the full engagement of both scientists and citizens.&amp;#160;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Written in straightforward language but without denying the complexity of the issues, &lt;i&gt;Genomes and What to Make of Them&lt;/i&gt; is both an up-to-date primer and a blueprint for the future.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/05/9780226054568.jpeg" length="13429" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Biological Sciences: Biochemistry</category>
      <category>Biological Sciences: Microbiology</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Medical Science</category>
      <category>Philosophy of Science</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Barry Barnes; John Dupré</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226054568</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Panaceia's Daughters</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo14397331.html</link>
      <description>Panaceia’s Daughters provides the first book-length study of noblewomen’s healing activities in early modern Europe. Drawing on rich archival sources, Alisha Rankin demonstrates that numerous German noblewomen were deeply involved in making medicines and recommending them to patients, and many gained widespread fame for their remedies. Turning a common historical argument on its head, Rankin maintains that noblewomen’s pharmacy came to prominence not in spite of their gender but because of it.&amp;#160;Rankin demonstrates the ways in which noblewomen’s pharmacy was bound up in notions of charity, class, religion, and household roles, as well as in expanding networks of knowledge and early forms of scientific experimentation. The opening chapters place noblewomen’s healing within the context of cultural exchange, experiential knowledge, and the widespread search for medicinal recipes in early modern Europe. Case studies of renowned healers Dorothea of Mansfeld and Anna of Saxony then demonstrate the value their pharmacy held in their respective roles as elderly widow and royal consort, while a study of the long-suffering Duchess Elisabeth of Rochlitz emphasizes the importance of experiential knowledge and medicinal remedies to the patient’s experience of illness.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Panaceia&amp;rsquo;s Daughters&lt;/i&gt; provides the first book-length study of noblewomen&amp;rsquo;s healing activities in early modern Europe. Drawing on rich archival sources, Alisha Rankin demonstrates that numerous German noblewomen were deeply involved in making medicines and recommending them to patients, and many gained widespread fame for their remedies. Turning a common historical argument on its head, Rankin maintains that noblewomen&amp;rsquo;s pharmacy came to prominence not in spite of their gender but because of it.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Rankin demonstrates the ways in which noblewomen&amp;rsquo;s pharmacy was bound up in notions of charity, class, religion, and household roles, as well as in expanding networks of knowledge and early forms of scientific experimentation. The opening chapters place noblewomen&amp;rsquo;s healing within the context of cultural exchange, experiential knowledge, and the widespread search for medicinal recipes in early modern Europe. Case studies of renowned healers Dorothea of Mansfeld and Anna of Saxony then demonstrate the value their pharmacy held in their respective roles as elderly widow and royal consort, while a study of the long-suffering Duchess Elisabeth of Rochlitz emphasizes the importance of experiential knowledge and medicinal remedies to the patient&amp;rsquo;s experience of illness.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/92/9780226925387.jpeg" length="32419" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>History: European History</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Medical Science</category>
      <category>Women's Studies</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Alisha Rankin</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226925387</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Between Mind and Nature</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/B/bo15583895.html</link>
      <description>From William James to Ivan Pavlov, John Dewey to Sigmund Freud, the W&amp;uuml;rzburg School to the Chicago School, psychology has spanned centuries and continents. Today, the word is an all-encompassing name for a bewildering range of beliefs about what psychologists know and do, and this intrinsic interest in knowing how our own and other’s minds work has a story as fascinating and complex as humankind itself. In Between Mind and Nature, Roger Smith explores the history of psychology and its relation to religion, politics, the arts, social life, the natural sciences, and technology.&amp;#160;Considering the big questions bound up in the history of psychology, Smith investigates what human nature is,&amp;#160;whether psychology can provide answers to human problems, and&amp;#160;whether the notion of being an individual depends on social and historical conditions. He also asks&amp;#160;whether a method of rational thinking exists outside the realm of natural science. Posing important questions about the value and direction of psychology today, Between Mind and Nature is a cogently written book for those wishing to know more about the quest for knowledge of the mind.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;From William James to Ivan Pavlov, John Dewey to Sigmund Freud, the W&amp;uuml;rzburg School to the Chicago School, psychology has spanned centuries and continents. Today, the word is an all-encompassing name for a bewildering range of beliefs about what psychologists know and do, and this intrinsic interest in knowing how our own and other&amp;rsquo;s minds work has a story as fascinating and complex as humankind itself. In &lt;i&gt;Between Mind and Nature&lt;/i&gt;, Roger Smith explores the history of psychology and its relation to religion, politics, the arts, social life, the natural sciences, and technology.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Considering the big questions bound up in the history of psychology, Smith investigates what human nature is,&amp;#160;whether psychology can provide answers to human problems, and&amp;#160;whether the notion of being an individual depends on social and historical conditions. He also asks&amp;#160;whether a method of rational thinking exists outside the realm of natural science. Posing important questions about the value and direction of psychology today, &lt;i&gt;Between Mind and Nature&lt;/i&gt; is a cogently written book for those wishing to know more about the quest for knowledge of the mind.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/17/80/23/9781780230986.jpg" length="33140" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <category>Psychology: General Psychology</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Roger Smith</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9781780230986</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Treasuring the Gaze</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo5556656.html</link>
      <description>The end of the eighteenth century saw the start of a new craze in Europe: tiny portraits of single eyes that were exchanged by lovers or family members. Worn as brooches or pendants, these minuscule eyes served the same emotional need as more conventional mementoes, such as lockets containing a coil of a loved one’s hair. The fashion lasted only a few decades, and by the early 1800s eye miniatures had faded into oblivion. Unearthing these portraits in Treasuring the Gaze, Hanneke Grootenboer proposes that the rage for eye miniatures—and their abrupt disappearance—reveals a knot in the unfolding of the history of vision.&amp;#160;Drawing on Alois Riegl, Jean-Luc Nancy, Marcia Pointon, Melanie Klein, and others, Grootenboer unravels this knot, discovering previously unseen patterns of looking and strategies for showing. She shows that eye miniatures portray the subject’s gaze rather than his or her eye, making the recipient of the keepsake an exclusive beholder who is perpetually watched. These treasured portraits always return the looks they receive and, as such, they create a reciprocal mode of viewing that Grootenboer calls intimate vision. Recounting stories about eye miniatures—including the role one played in the scandalous affair of Mrs. Fitzherbert and the Prince of Wales, a portrait of the mesmerizing eye of Lord Byron, and the loss and longing incorporated in crying eye miniatures—Grootenboer shows that intimate vision brings the gaze of another deep into the heart of private experience.&amp;#160;With a host of fascinating imagery from this eccentric and mostly forgotten yet deeply private keepsake, Treasuring the Gaze provides new insights into the art of miniature painting and the genre of portraiture.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;The end of the eighteenth century saw the start of a new craze in Europe: tiny portraits of single eyes that were exchanged by lovers or family members. Worn as brooches or pendants, these minuscule eyes served the same emotional need as more conventional mementoes, such as lockets containing a coil of a loved one&amp;rsquo;s hair. The fashion lasted only a few decades, and by the early 1800s eye miniatures had faded into oblivion. Unearthing these portraits in &lt;i&gt;Treasuring the Gaze&lt;/i&gt;, Hanneke Grootenboer proposes that the rage for eye miniatures&amp;mdash;and their abrupt disappearance&amp;mdash;reveals a knot in the unfolding of the history of vision.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Drawing on Alois Riegl, Jean-Luc Nancy, Marcia Pointon, Melanie Klein, and others, Grootenboer unravels this knot, discovering previously unseen patterns of looking and strategies for showing. She shows that eye miniatures portray the subject&amp;rsquo;s gaze rather than his or her eye, making the recipient of the keepsake an exclusive beholder who is perpetually watched. These treasured portraits always return the looks they receive and, as such, they create a reciprocal mode of viewing that Grootenboer calls intimate vision. Recounting stories about eye miniatures&amp;mdash;including the role one played in the scandalous affair of Mrs. Fitzherbert and the Prince of Wales, a portrait of the mesmerizing eye of Lord Byron, and the loss and longing incorporated in crying eye miniatures&amp;mdash;Grootenboer shows that intimate vision brings the gaze of another deep into the heart of private experience.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;With a host of fascinating imagery from this eccentric and mostly forgotten yet deeply private keepsake, &lt;i&gt;Treasuring the Gaze&lt;/i&gt; provides new insights into the art of miniature painting and the genre of portraiture.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/30/9780226309668.jpeg" length="27150" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Art: European Art</category>
      <category>History of Science</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2013 06:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Hanneke Grootenboer</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226309668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
