<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>University of Chicago Press: New Titles in Education: Pre-School, Elementary and Secondary Education</title>
    <link>http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/rss/books/RSS.xml</link>
    <description>The latest new books in Education: Pre-School, Elementary and Secondary Education</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <ttl>1440</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>These Kids</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo15357231.html</link>
      <description>Few would deny that getting ahead is a legitimate goal of learning, but the phrase implies a cruel hierarchy: a student does not simply get ahead, but gets ahead of others. In These Kids, Kysa Nygreen turns a critical eye on this paradox. Offering the voices and viewpoints of students at a “last chance” high school in California, she tells the story of students who have, in fact, been left behind.&amp;#160;Detailing a youth-led participatory action research project that she coordinated, Nygreen uncovers deep barriers to educational success that are embedded within educational discourse itself. Struggling students internalize descriptions of themselves as “at risk,” “low achieving,” or “troubled”—and by adopting the very language of educators, they also adopt its constraints and presumption of failure. Showing how current educational discourse does not, ultimately, provide an adequate vision of change for students at the bottom of the educational hierarchy, she levies a powerful argument that social justice in education is impossible today precisely because of how we talk about it.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;Few would deny that getting ahead is a legitimate goal of learning, but the phrase implies a cruel hierarchy: a student does not simply get ahead, but gets ahead of others. In &lt;i&gt;These Kids&lt;/i&gt;, Kysa Nygreen turns a critical eye on this paradox. Offering the voices and viewpoints of students at a &amp;ldquo;last chance&amp;rdquo; high school in California, she tells the story of students who have, in fact, been left behind.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Detailing a youth-led participatory action research project that she coordinated, Nygreen uncovers deep barriers to educational success that are embedded within educational discourse itself. Struggling students internalize descriptions of themselves as &amp;ldquo;at risk,&amp;rdquo; &amp;ldquo;low achieving,&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;troubled&amp;rdquo;&amp;mdash;and by adopting the very language of educators, they also adopt its constraints and presumption of failure. Showing how current educational discourse does not, ultimately, provide an adequate vision of change for students at the bottom of the educational hierarchy, she levies a powerful argument that social justice in education is impossible today precisely because of how we talk about it.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/03/9780226031569.jpeg" length="43146" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Education: Curriculum and Methodology</category>
      <category>Education: Pre-School, Elementary and Secondary Education</category>
      <category>Sociology: Individual, State and Society</category>
      <category>Sociology: Social Organization--Stratification, Mobility</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Kysa Nygreen</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226031422</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top Student, Top School?</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/T/bo15506888.html</link>
      <description>Most of us think that valedictorians can write their own ticket. By reaching the top of their class they have proven their merit, so their next logical step should be to attend the nation’s very best universities. Yet in Top Student, Top School?, Alexandria Walton Radford reveals that many valedictorians do not enroll in prestigious institutions. Employing an original five-state study that surveyed nine hundred public high school valedictorians, she sets out to determine when and why valedictorians end up at less selective schools, showing that social class makes all the difference.&amp;#160;Radford traces valedictorians’ paths to college and presents damning evidence that high schools do not provide sufficient guidance on crucial factors affecting college selection, such as reputation, financial aid, and even the application process itself. Left in a bewildering environment of seemingly similar options, many students depend on their parents for assistance—and this allows social class to rear its head and have a profound impact on where students attend. Simply put, parents from less affluent backgrounds are far less informed about differences in colleges’ quality, the college application process, and financial aid options, which significantly limits their child’s chances of attending a competitive school, even when their child has already managed to become valedictorian.&amp;#160;Top Student, Top School? pinpoints an overlooked yet critical juncture in the education process, one that stands as a barrier to class mobility. By focusing solely on valedictorians, it shows that students’ paths diverge by social class even when they are similarly well-prepared academically, and this divergence is traceable to specific failures by society, failures that we can and should address.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;Most of us think that valedictorians can write their own ticket. By reaching the top of their class they have proven their merit, so their next logical step should be to attend the nation&amp;rsquo;s very best universities. Yet in &lt;i&gt;Top Student, Top School?&lt;/i&gt;, Alexandria Walton Radford reveals that many valedictorians do not enroll in prestigious institutions. Employing an original five-state study that surveyed nine hundred public high school valedictorians, she sets out to determine when and why valedictorians end up at less selective schools, showing that social class makes all the difference.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Radford traces valedictorians&amp;rsquo; paths to college and presents damning evidence that high schools do not provide sufficient guidance on crucial factors affecting college selection, such as reputation, financial aid, and even the application process itself. Left in a bewildering environment of seemingly similar options, many students depend on their parents for assistance&amp;mdash;and this allows social class to rear its head and have a profound impact on where students attend. Simply put, parents from less affluent backgrounds are far less informed about differences in colleges&amp;rsquo; quality, the college application process, and financial aid options, which significantly limits their child&amp;rsquo;s chances of attending a competitive school, even when their child has already managed to become valedictorian.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;i&gt;Top Student, Top School?&lt;/i&gt; pinpoints an overlooked yet critical juncture in the education process, one that stands as a barrier to class mobility. By focusing solely on valedictorians, it shows that students&amp;rsquo; paths diverge by social class even when they are similarly well-prepared academically, and this divergence is traceable to specific failures by society, failures that we can and should address.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/04/9780226041001.jpeg" length="28626" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Education: Higher Education</category>
      <category>Education: Pre-School, Elementary and Secondary Education</category>
      <category>Sociology: Social Organization--Stratification, Mobility</category>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Alexandria Walton Radford</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226040950</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Marketing Schools, Marketing Cities</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/M/bo15112913.html</link>
      <description>Discuss real estate with any young family and the subject of schools is certain to come up—in fact, it will likely be a crucial factor in determining where that family lives. Not merely institutions of learning, schools have increasingly become a sign of a neighborhood’s vitality, and city planners have ever more explicitly promoted “good schools” as a means of attracting more affluent families to urban areas, a dynamic process that Maia Bloomfield Cucchiara critically examines in Marketing Schools, Marketing Cities.&amp;#160;Focusing on Philadelphia’s Center City Schools Initiative, she shows how education policy makes overt attempts to prevent, or at least slow, middle-class flight to the suburbs. Navigating complex ethical terrain, she balances the successes of such policies in strengthening urban schools and communities against the inherent social injustices they propagate—the further marginalization and disempowerment of lowerclass families. By asking what happens when affluent parents become “valued customers,” Marketing Schools, Marketing Cities uncovers a problematic relationship between public institutions and private markets, where the former are used to leverage the latter to effect urban transformations.</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;Discuss real estate with any young family and the subject of schools is certain to come up&amp;mdash;in fact, it will likely be a crucial factor in determining where that family lives. Not merely institutions of learning, schools have increasingly become a sign of a neighborhood&amp;rsquo;s vitality, and city planners have ever more explicitly promoted &amp;ldquo;good schools&amp;rdquo; as a means of attracting more affluent families to urban areas, a dynamic process that Maia Bloomfield Cucchiara critically examines in &lt;i&gt;Marketing Schools, Marketing Cities&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;#160;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Focusing on Philadelphia&amp;rsquo;s Center City Schools Initiative, she shows how education policy makes overt attempts to prevent, or at least slow, middle-class flight to the suburbs. Navigating complex ethical terrain, she balances the successes of such policies in strengthening urban schools and communities against the inherent social injustices they propagate&amp;mdash;the further marginalization and disempowerment of lowerclass families. By asking what happens when affluent parents become &amp;ldquo;valued customers,&amp;rdquo; &lt;i&gt;Marketing Schools, Marketing Cities&lt;/i&gt; uncovers a problematic relationship between public institutions and private markets, where the former are used to leverage the latter to effect urban transformations.&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/02/26/01/9780226016825.jpeg" length="31436" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Education: Education--Economics, Law, Politics</category>
      <category>Education: Pre-School, Elementary and Secondary Education</category>
      <category>Sociology: Social Institutions</category>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Apr 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Maia Bloomfield Cucchiara</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9780226016658</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>School Admissions and Accountability</title>
      <link>http://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/S/bo15550680.html</link>
      <description>The processes for allocating places at secondary schools in England are always controversial. School Admissions and Accountability addresses issues relevant to school admissions over the past sixty years, exploring three primary ways it has been done: planning via local authorities, quasi-market mechanisms, and random allocation. Each approach is assessed on its own terms, but also examined via constitutional and legal analysis. The book shows how repeated failure to identify and pursue specific values for school admissions underlies questions regarding the fairness of the process. Interdisciplinary in approach, it makes the issue of school admissions relevant and accessible to a wide readership in education, social policy, and sociolegal studies.?</description>
      <content:encoded>&lt;div&gt;The processes for allocating places at secondary schools in England are always controversial. &lt;i&gt;School Admissions and Accountability&lt;/i&gt; addresses issues relevant to school admissions over the past sixty years, exploring three primary ways it has been done: planning via local authorities, quasi-market mechanisms, and random allocation. Each approach is assessed on its own terms, but also examined via constitutional and legal analysis. The book shows how repeated failure to identify and pursue specific values for school admissions underlies questions regarding the fairness of the process. Interdisciplinary in approach, it makes the issue of school admissions relevant and accessible to a wide readership in education, social policy, and sociolegal studies.?&lt;/div&gt;</content:encoded>
      <enclosure url="http://press.uchicago.edu/dms/ucp/books/jacket/978/14/47/30/9781447306238.jpg" length="70052" type="image/jpeg" />
      <category>Education: Pre-School, Elementary and Secondary Education</category>
      <category>Sociology: General Sociology</category>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Mar 2013 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <author>Mike Feintuck; Roz Stevens</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">9781447306238</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
