The Votes That Counted
How the Court Decided the 2000 Presidential Election
325 pages
|
1 table
|
6 x 9
|
© 2001
The dramatic struggle over the outcome of the 2000 presidential election presented judges with an extraordinary political challenge, as well as a historic political temptation. In The Votes That Counted Howard Gillman offers a comprehensive yet critical assessment of how well courts coped with the competing expectations for impartial justice and favorable partisan results.
Lively and authoritative, the book documents how the participants, the press, the academic community, and the public responded during these tension-filled thirty-six days. Gillman also provides a serious yet accessible overview of the legal strategies and debates-from briefs and oral arguments to final decisions. However, in explaining the behavior of courts, he moves beyond an analysis of law to also take into account the influences of partisanship, judicial ideology, and broader political and historical contexts.
Appropriately, Gillman pays special attention to the judges whose behavior generated the most controversy—the battling justices of the Florida and United States Supreme Courts. After carefully reviewing the arguments for and against their decisions, he concludes that the five justices behind the Bush v. Gore decision acted outside what should be considered the acceptable boundaries of judicial power. Gillman ends with an analysis of why they chose such an unprecedented course of action and an assessment of whether their partisan intervention will have any lasting effect on the Supreme Court's reputation and authority.
Lively and authoritative, the book documents how the participants, the press, the academic community, and the public responded during these tension-filled thirty-six days. Gillman also provides a serious yet accessible overview of the legal strategies and debates-from briefs and oral arguments to final decisions. However, in explaining the behavior of courts, he moves beyond an analysis of law to also take into account the influences of partisanship, judicial ideology, and broader political and historical contexts.
Appropriately, Gillman pays special attention to the judges whose behavior generated the most controversy—the battling justices of the Florida and United States Supreme Courts. After carefully reviewing the arguments for and against their decisions, he concludes that the five justices behind the Bush v. Gore decision acted outside what should be considered the acceptable boundaries of judicial power. Gillman ends with an analysis of why they chose such an unprecedented course of action and an assessment of whether their partisan intervention will have any lasting effect on the Supreme Court's reputation and authority.
Contents
Preface
Acknowledgments
Chronology of Events
Introduction: Courts and the Political Challenge of Election 2000
1. Who Won? The Election Goes to Court
2. Changing the Rules? The Florida Supreme Court, Round One
3. A Shot across the Bow: The U.S. Supreme Court Enters the Fray
4. Gore's Last Chance: The Florida Supreme Court, Round Two
5. The Dam Breaks: Five Justices Pick a President
6. The Politics behind the Votes That Counted
Appendixes
A. Provisions of the U.S. Constitution Relating to Election 2000 Litigation
B. Provisions of Federal Statutory Law Relating to Election 2000 Litigation
C. Provisions of Florida Election Law Relating to Election 2000 Litigation
D. Highlights of Major Cases in the 2000 Presidential Election Dispute
Notes
Selected Bibliography
Table of Cases
Index
Acknowledgments
Chronology of Events
Introduction: Courts and the Political Challenge of Election 2000
1. Who Won? The Election Goes to Court
2. Changing the Rules? The Florida Supreme Court, Round One
3. A Shot across the Bow: The U.S. Supreme Court Enters the Fray
4. Gore's Last Chance: The Florida Supreme Court, Round Two
5. The Dam Breaks: Five Justices Pick a President
6. The Politics behind the Votes That Counted
Appendixes
A. Provisions of the U.S. Constitution Relating to Election 2000 Litigation
B. Provisions of Federal Statutory Law Relating to Election 2000 Litigation
C. Provisions of Florida Election Law Relating to Election 2000 Litigation
D. Highlights of Major Cases in the 2000 Presidential Election Dispute
Notes
Selected Bibliography
Table of Cases
Index
For more information, or to order this book, please visit http://www.press.uchicago.edu
Google preview here
Law and Legal Studies: The Constitution and the Courts
Political Science: American Government and Politics
You may purchase this title at these fine bookstores. Outside the USA, see our international sales information.
