Out of Many, One
Obama and the Third American Political Tradition
Bearing traces of Baruch Spinoza, John Dewey, and Saul Alinsky, Obama’s progressivism embraces the ideas of mutual reliance and collective responsibility, and adopts an interconnected view of the individual and the state. So, while Obama might emphasize difference, he rejects identity politics, which can create permanent minorities and diminish individual agency. Analyzing Obama’s major legislative victories—financial regulation, health care, and the stimulus package—O’Brien shows how they reflect a stakeholder society that neither regulates in the manner of the New Deal nor deregulates. Instead, Obama focuses on negotiated rule making and allows executive branch agencies to fill in the details when dealing with a deadlocked Congress. Similarly, his commitment to difference and his resistance to universal mandates underlies his reluctance to advocate for human rights as much as many on the Democratic left had hoped.
1 In the Beginning: Locke, Rousseau, and Two Political Traditions
2 The Third Political Tradition—Reclaiming the Frontier: Wagon Trains, Pioneers, and Deputies, but No Cowboys or Nannies
3 Thinking in Threes: Diversity, Destruction, Redemption, and Social Policy Ruptures
4 Obama Stakes the Nation: A Spinozan Stakeholder State, Market, and Society
5 Foreign Stakeholders: Just War and Just Peace in a New World Order of Universal Anti-Universalism
6 A Lose-Lose Leader, or a Script for a President?
7 The Prius Presidency: A “Paramount Empire of Reason”?