Cloth $45.00 ISBN: 9780226474502 Published August 2017
E-book $45.00 About E-books ISBN: 9780226474649 Published August 2017 Also Available From
E-book Retailers: Apple iBooks B&N Nook Google Play Kobo Library Vendors: EBSCO

The Democratic Constitution

Experimentalism and Interpretation

Brian E. Butler

The Democratic Constitution

Brian E. Butler

248 pages | 6 x 9 | © 2017
Cloth $45.00 ISBN: 9780226474502 Published August 2017
E-book $45.00 About E-books ISBN: 9780226474649 Published August 2017
The Supreme Court is seen today as the ultimate arbiter of the Constitution. Once the Court has spoken, it is the duty of the citizens and their elected officials to abide by its decisions. But the conception of the Supreme Court as the final interpreter of constitutional law took hold only relatively recently. Drawing on the pragmatic ideals characterized by Charles Sanders Peirce, John Dewey, Charles Sabel, and Richard Posner. Brian E. Butler shows how this conception is inherently problematic for a healthy democracy.
           
Butler offers an alternative democratic conception of constitutional law, “democratic experimentalism,” and applies it in a thorough reconstruction of Supreme Court cases across the centuries, such as Brown v. Board of Education, Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, and Lochner v. New York. In contrast to the traditional tools and conceptions of legal analysis that see the law as a formally unique and separate type of practice, democratic experimentalism combines democratic aims and experimental practice. Butler also suggests other directions jurisprudential roles could take: for example, adjudication could be performed by primary stakeholders with better information. Ultimately, Butler argues persuasively for a move away from the current absolute centrality of courts toward a system of justice that emphasizes local rule and democratic choice. 
 
Review Quotes
John Shook, University at Buffalo, SUNY
“Dominant paradigms of political and legal theory have not been able to identify the best relationship between constitution in theory and democracy in practice, evident in the way judicial supremacy over constitutional interpretation goes almost unquestioned. Butler tackles this difficult philosophical issue with his own systematic legal experimentalism, guiding readers through dozens of Supreme Court cases across two centuries to show where the dominant paradigms require supplementation or replacement. The book will be a lightning rod for rival theories, but even scholars beholden to competing paradigms will appreciate how carefully Butler arrives at his conclusions.”
For more information, or to order this book, please visit http://www.press.uchicago.edu
Google preview here

Chicago Manual of Style |

Events in Law

Keep Informed

JOURNALs